re: You missed the point

Flame » in reply to You missed the points:

re: You missed the point

Tom Brosz — 10/30/2005 10:53:41 PM (archived)

Frankly, I don't give a rat's ass what happens to Scooter Libby. I haven't been defending him.

I've just pointed out the supposed crimes (called "treason" by many leftists) that he, Rove, Cheney, and You-Name-It were supposed to have committed apparently did not inspire indictments after two years of investigation, and after going over a lot of information I guarantee you and I have not been privy to.

The whole thread (34 posts)

Twas the Night Before Fitzmas... - Lindy - 10/28/2005 1:54:53 AM
- Wait for it. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2005 4:10:38 AM
  - Waited, waited, waited, opened, saw. Happy. (n/t) - Tony - 10/28/2005 5:17:36 PM
  - You know, with this general a statement... - alcaray - 10/28/2005 4:44:27 PM
    - I told you so (n/t) - alcaray - 10/30/2005 4:43:21 PM
    - re: You know, with this general a statement... - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2005 8:51:45 PM
      - If Libby hadn't lied, there might be PROOF of a crime - dtb - 10/29/2005 7:20:26 PM
        
        I must be missing something. - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2005 8:53:46 PM
        
        You are. - Tony - 10/31/2005 9:20:35 PM
      - So you are saying, then, that the Clinton impeachment was unfair? (n/t) - R.L. - 10/29/2005 6:41:01 AM
        
        I didn't say this indictment was unfair. - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2005 6:43:22 AM
        
        At least this was directly related - tony - 10/29/2005 2:37:11 PM
      - Shall we now speak of "moral relativism"? - Fox - 10/29/2005 2:02:31 AM
        
        Yer TV is missing. No indictment, no burglary? (n/t) - Bowser - 10/29/2005 12:18:54 PM
        
        Hello? - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2005 2:32:08 AM
        
        re: Hello? *knock knock* Is this working? - Fox - 10/29/2005 3:28:25 AM
        
        Yes, a crime was committed. Unfortunately, not the one everyone was howling about. - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2005 6:41:08 AM
        
        Are you saying NOBODY outed Plame? - Laurie Street - 10/30/2005 9:00:07 PM
        
        I discussed this over on CE. Here's the deal. - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/31/2005 4:13:19 AM
        
        How? Why are you asking me? Ask Fitzgerald. He had all the information. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2005 10:45:36 PM
        
        Well no, he didn't, because Scooter lied to him. - Fox - 10/31/2005 4:01:05 AM
        
        For me to accept that premise... - Tom Brosz - 10/31/2005 5:07:29 AM
        
        And Al Capone was innocent excet for evading taxes. - tony - 10/29/2005 2:39:58 PM
      - "If the investigation had never taken place, there would have been no crime." - Mary Anne - 10/28/2005 11:46:29 PM
        
        Fitzgerald - Mary Anne - 10/29/2005 3:42:22 AM
      - "there would have been no crime"? - Robert - 10/28/2005 10:54:10 PM
        
        I think you may have missed the point. - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2005 2:37:31 AM
        
        You missed the points: - alcaray - 10/30/2005 4:50:28 PM
        
        re: You missed the point - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2005 10:53:41 PM
        
        Nope - Robert - 10/29/2005 4:40:25 AM
        
        I guess you have to take what you can get, if it saves face. - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2005 6:34:37 AM
        
        Again: obstructing justice is a serious crime. - Mary Anne - 10/29/2005 1:18:54 PM
        
        Dan Schorr said this morning.. - tony - 10/29/2005 2:42:57 PM
      - " If the investigation had never taken place, there would have been no crime" - Lindy - 10/28/2005 10:42:59 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (34 posts)