Uh Tom, it's not over yet.
I'll wager a bet Fitzgerald has just gotten started.
There's a pile of stuff he's following up on.
Well, thank God you're not a CIA agent who disagrees with this administrations lies for starting wars, and putting us in debt over our head while their buddies in the oil and contracting business get richer and richer....
Thank God YOU don't ever have to worry about being outed for revenge while disagreeing with this administration.....something loosely called "treason". No, not you. But REAL Americans who might be protecting our country from REAL terrorists, don't like the insinuations ....the intimidation, the messages....coming down from on high, and ...uh, might just be a tad upset.
Again, your reasoning " If the investigation had never taken place, there would have been no crime" says it all.
Duh.
Flame » in reply to re: You know, with this general a statement...
" If the investigation had never taken place, there would have been no crime"
The whole thread (34 posts)
- Twas the Night Before Fitzmas...
- Wait for it. (n/t)
- Waited, waited, waited, opened, saw. Happy. (n/t)
- You know, with this general a statement...
- I told you so (n/t)
- re: You know, with this general a statement...
- If Libby hadn't lied, there might be PROOF of a crime
- So you are saying, then, that the Clinton impeachment was unfair? (n/t)
- Shall we now speak of "moral relativism"?
- "If the investigation had never taken place, there would have been no crime."
- "there would have been no crime"?
- " If the investigation had never taken place, there would have been no crime"
- Wait for it. (n/t)