"However, I have confidence that most modern scientists would say that the evidence supports evolutionary theory, while there is no evidence for the existence of God, or that He created the world in seven days. Bluntly stated, I think most scientists ARE atheists, and if asked they would reply frankly, that there is no God."
I would say your confidence is misplaced.
"When asked whether he believed that science and Christianity were competing world views, Hawking replied, "...then Newton would not have discovered the law of gravity." He knew that Newton had strong religious convictions. "
...
"Hawking pokes fun at Albert Einstein for not believing in quantum mechanics. When asked why he didn't believe in quantum mechanics, Einstein would say things like, "Well, God doesn't play dice with human beings"(p. 56). Hawking's response is that God not only plays with dice, He sometimes throws them where they can't be seen."
Specifically:
"Atheism
It is very rare that a physical scientist is truly an atheist. Why is this true? Freeman Dyson, a Princeton faculty member, has said, "Nature has been kinder to us than we had any right to expect." "
...
"Against overwhelming logic, some atheists continue to claim that the universe and human life were created by chance. A reply to this argument has been developed by the philosopher, William Lane Craig. The atheist's argument states that since we're here, we know this must have all happened by material forces. Craig's counter-argument states,
Suppose a dozen sharp-shooters are sent to execute a prisoner by firing squad. They all shoot a number of rounds in that direction, but the prisoner escapes unharmed. The prisoner could conclude, since he is alive, that all the sharp-shooters missed by some extremely unlikely chance. He may wish to attribute his survival to some remarkable piece of good luck. But he would be far more rational to conclude that the guns were loaded with blanks or that the sharp-shooters had deliberately missed. Not only is life itself overwhelmingly improbable, but its appearance, almost immediately, perhaps in as short a period as 10 million years following the solidification and cooling of our once molten planet, defies explanation by conventional physical and chemical laws."
http://www.leaderu.com/real/ri9501/bigbang2.html
Off Topic » in reply to You're overemphasizing semantics
re: You're overemphasizing semantics
The whole thread (18 posts)
- A European Legacy
- I don't really agree with the article
- re: I don't really agree with the article
- More than just personal feeling.
- I don't really agree with the article
