160 kmh = 100 mph

Off Topic » in reply to Basic version only goes 75 mph. Not sure I can drive that slow.

160 kmh = 100 mph

Laurie Street — 3/20/2006 8:45:58 PM (archived)

Not sure I believe that 20 hp can make it go that fast, but that's the claim.

100 mph still isn't fast enough, though.

The whole thread (41 posts)

157 mpg car to go on sale soon. - Lee - 3/19/2006 8:52:58 AM
- Having looked it over a bit, I have some comments. - David F Mayer - 3/26/2006 5:20:25 AM
- Basic version only goes 75 mph. Not sure I can drive that slow. (n/t) - alcaray - 3/20/2006 5:42:39 PM
  - 160 kmh = 100 mph - Laurie Street - 3/20/2006 8:45:58 PM
    - 100 mph isn't fast enough?? - Lindy - 3/21/2006 3:31:51 PM
      - Nah - this might do it, though - Laurie Street - 3/21/2006 8:10:06 PM
        
        Wow, that's SOME car! - Lindy - 3/21/2006 11:15:10 PM
        
        My personal dream car - Laurie Street - 3/22/2006 10:05:22 PM
        
        re: My personal dream car - Lindy - 3/22/2006 10:33:14 PM
    - Huh! I did the translation on 120. Should have cut and pasted. (n/t) - alcaray - 3/20/2006 9:54:09 PM
- I want a one-seat car - SDF - 3/20/2006 4:12:48 PM
  - How about this? - REB - 3/23/2006 9:13:39 PM
  - The US should be marketing them - Lindy - 3/20/2006 6:32:13 PM
    - re: The US should be marketing them - SDG - 3/20/2006 8:46:16 PM
      - Mom caught using decoy passenger in her car so she could drive in the carpool lane - SDF - 3/23/2006 3:56:24 PM
      - I just realized that you must be over 40 years old. - SDF - 3/22/2006 11:27:15 AM
        
        31, but still old-fashioned I guess (n/t) - SDG - 3/22/2006 4:59:43 PM
        
        I'm 103 and still go out on "dates" - Lindy - 3/22/2006 10:35:02 PM
        
        Ya look darn good for 103, girl! (n/t) - Laurie Street - 3/22/2006 11:29:00 PM
      - Maybe the car could be designed to split in half lengthwise - SDF - 3/21/2006 3:04:09 PM
- How much does it weigh? How many does it carry? How much trunk capacity? (n/t) - David F Mayer - 3/19/2006 7:38:12 PM
  - Check the website - Larry J - 3/20/2006 3:57:51 PM
    - rear facing back seats - SDG - 3/20/2006 8:37:56 PM
      - re: rear facing back seats - SteveS - 3/21/2006 12:51:03 AM
      - re: rear facing back seats - Larry J - 3/20/2006 9:53:11 PM
        
        re: rear facing back seats - SDG - 3/20/2006 11:30:57 PM
        
        Qutie a few - Larry J - 3/21/2006 2:01:29 PM
        
        I was referring to the smaller ground attack aircraft - Lee - 3/21/2006 3:20:36 PM
        
        Pretty much all of the ones with a tail gunner. (n/t) - Lee - 3/21/2006 7:01:13 AM
        
        images - sdg - 3/20/2006 11:33:49 PM
- The LS model is probably too underpowered for the US market - Larry J - 3/19/2006 6:13:51 PM
  - Does it say if the car has what is needed to make it U.S.-legal? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 3/19/2006 11:03:18 PM
    - Not that I saw - Larry J - 3/20/2006 2:05:48 PM
  - I thought the same thing. - Lee - 3/19/2006 8:44:28 PM
- It's a Beauty - Lindy - 3/19/2006 11:11:03 AM
  - Amazing - SteveS - 3/19/2006 5:06:04 PM
    - New AUDI turbo-diesel - Lindy - 3/20/2006 12:06:55 AM
    - Su-wweet! - Lindy - 3/19/2006 11:19:41 PM
      - re: Su-wweet! - SteveS - 3/20/2006 2:19:21 PM
    - The new stang is a sweet ride. - Lee - 3/19/2006 8:42:15 PM
      - re: The new stang is a sweet ride. - Lindy - 3/19/2006 11:25:53 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (41 posts)