Consider this.
Typical. Almost a book, you don't care to pick out the relevant parts or digest the information with your spin.
Nope. You post a book, or blog, or whatever without bothering to read it yourself, I'd guess.
If you did, you could paraphrase.
And then you climb on a high horse and accuse people with real lives of not reading the matter.
And/or, the hit-and-run tactic of suggesting someone hadn't read their own post simply because the post may contain two sides of the story. Unlike your blogs, which are blatant propaganda, most reasonable stories will contain two sides.
That, of course, doesn't mean that both are equally valid, as the poster usually points out.
Contrasted with, as we have noted, the one-sided, often paid by the Bushies, propaganda in the right-wing blogs such as you site. In toto. Ad nauseum.
Arf
Flame » in reply to re: tactics.
And you, Tom, are the worst.
The whole thread (47 posts)
- A couple of neocon tactics.
- But...but....it's a secret!!
- re: tactics.
- Yella dawg..............
- And you, Tom, are the worst.
- Why yes, I read the whole article.
- Tom! About the biggest raft of nonsense you've ever tried to float.
- Ya know, Bowser,
- At least
- With all due respect, Robert,
- Ya know, Bowser,
- "You see, I don't need my need my information pre-chewed, simplified, and spun for me, either by posters or journalists." Unless Berkley is mentioned. (n/t)
- Or Robert Fisk.... (n/t)
- Tom! About the biggest raft of nonsense you've ever tried to float.
- Why yes, I read the whole article.