You basically repeated what I said. Voting rights are still a state issue. This is why I don't support a Federal photo ID for voting--it's not in their jurisdiction--but have no objection to states requiring one.
As I said, every voter ID law I've seen proposed is so broad, and the costs so minimal, that it's deliberately deceptive to throw the term "poll tax" into the mix. Real poll taxes were $30.00 a year and up (2005 dollars). A picture ID costs something like $15 bucks every six years, and most voter ID laws make a provision for subsidies. Add to that the other means of ID that are acceptable.
I would have no objection at all to the laws paying for non-driver picture IDs out of tax money. Part of the legitimate cost of voting, like paying poll workers.
Off Topic » in reply to The Tenth Amendment
re: The Tenth Amendment
The whole thread (22 posts)
- Fixed Elections
- Cynthia McKinney's going to tell us how it is?
- McKinney's got more credibility in her little finger than all the rest of the Congress combined
- It certainly wasn't to keep blacks from voting.
- "Conscience" has little to do with this.
- re: "Conscience" has little to do with this.
- re: Cynthia McKinney's going to tell us how it is?
- McKinney's got more credibility in her little finger than all the rest of the Congress combined
- Cynthia McKinney's going to tell us how it is?
