He has a point on number two.

Current Events » in reply to Yes, no, and who cares?

He has a point on number two.

Tom Brosz — 10/2/2006 5:19:46 PM (archived)

There is considerable evidence that newspapers and Democratic organizations have been squatting on this for some time. If criminal action does eventually result, that's going to be just as tough to explain for them as for the Republicans.

The whole thread (35 posts)

Foleygate - Donald - 10/1/2006 2:13:49 PM
- Newt speaks - ER - 10/2/2006 11:09:53 AM
  - re: Newt speaks - Lindy - 10/2/2006 3:18:40 PM
  - Foley is a freak. - Scott Evil - 10/2/2006 1:45:49 PM
    - Yes, no, and who cares? - Mary Anne - 10/2/2006 5:11:55 PM
      - I have no idea who was involved in a "cover-up" or even if said "Cover-up" existed. - Scott Evil - 10/3/2006 2:35:06 PM
        
        It begins to appear that Hastert lied about it, and other Republicans... - alcaray - 10/3/2006 5:57:20 PM
      - He has a point on number two. - Tom Brosz - 10/2/2006 5:19:46 PM
        
        not a "Democratic" organization - dtb - 10/2/2006 6:13:55 PM
        
        re: not a "Democratic" organization - Tom Brosz - 10/2/2006 6:34:48 PM
        
        Linda Tripp - dtb - 10/2/2006 8:16:08 PM
        
        And if that's so, I agree. - Mary Anne - 10/2/2006 5:21:35 PM
        
        I support an investigation - Tom Brosz - 10/2/2006 5:40:24 PM
        
        Pray tell. (n/t) - Tony - 10/4/2006 3:55:16 PM
    - I think I've figured it out. - Lindy - 10/2/2006 3:36:08 PM
      - Was that Clinton's excuse or Foley's? - Scott Evil - 10/2/2006 5:10:11 PM
        
        The country mourns the loss of the possibility of President Evil. - alcaray - 10/3/2006 5:46:01 PM
        
        What a crock - Buck Galaxy - 10/3/2006 5:07:32 PM
        
        did I miss a news report? - Scott Evil - 10/3/2006 7:57:12 PM
        
        re: did I miss a news report? - Buck Galaxy - 10/4/2006 4:46:27 AM
        
        Not that I find anything wrong with what you said - Lindy - 10/2/2006 11:30:47 PM
  - The other, painful underlying assumption in Newt's remark - Mary Anne - 10/2/2006 1:34:30 PM
    - re: underlying assumption - Tom Brosz - 10/2/2006 5:47:36 PM
      - Then it's a "straight" issue when it involves 16- and 17-year-old girls. - Mary Anne - 10/3/2006 12:09:55 AM
        
        Well it would be far more understandable - Lee - 10/3/2006 12:30:09 AM
    - Alcoholism is an illness. True story. - Bowser - 10/2/2006 4:23:56 PM
      - It's the new "Devil made me do it" excuse - Tony - 10/2/2006 6:49:51 PM
        
        Yep. And it's nonsense. (n/t) - Bowser - 10/2/2006 7:05:45 PM
- re: Foleygate - Tom Brosz - 10/1/2006 8:48:39 PM
  - I don't see any "attack" nor "smear" in the piece Donald linked to. - alcaray - 10/2/2006 8:59:46 PM
    - Believe it or not, Donald's link has not been the only story on this subject. - Tom Brosz - 10/2/2006 11:33:14 PM
  - amazing that you see the broad brushes now. - Tony - 10/2/2006 4:51:44 PM
  - And - "A Republican staff member warned congressional pages five years ago -" - Bowser - 10/1/2006 10:14:35 PM
  - Spin, ignore, deny, cherry-pick. Read something unbiased occasionally. (n/t) - Bowser - 10/1/2006 10:03:17 PM
    - My responses aren't for your benefit. - Tom Brosz - 10/1/2006 10:50:19 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (35 posts)