Your 'story' is a 'Flying Speghetti Monster'. Its not my job to disprove anything- rather its your job to do something other than perch there and cast a smug fairy tale. IE: You can cast what ever fictional myth that you want, its up to you to present some facts.

What few details you mention are absurd on the surface- A Sunni Dictator rising up and taking control of Iraq in the current climate? Absurd! The Shi'a Jihaddists in the pocket of the Europeans? insane!

Saddam Was not an instrument of Europe, he was our butt-monkey until he crossed a line in the sand.

We did not invade Iraq to keep the oil out of the hands of extremists. Its now more in danger of that than ever.

Bush 43 is not a meverick WRT the Saudi royal family, his ties are long established, well documented and very thick. This country has tied itself to the Saudi royal family for 20 years or more as one of the pillars of our pust-cold-war Middle East strategy, 43's position WRT the Saudis is entirel consistent with the last 20-30 years of political procedure in that area.

I don't know wha fevered crap you have been reading out in the Bloggosphere, but put away the internet and crack a book, for chrissakes. It really is like Johannes- you use the right 'terms': Shi'a, Sunni, Ba'athist, colonial, etc... But the way you put them together is entirely inconsistent with every basic fact about the region.

DL