The excuse used for torture, the only excuse, is the "ticking bomb" rationale, if information is needed immediately to prevent an immediate threat.
Torture to extract confessions to be used in criminal proceedings is not condoned by civilized societies. In fact, it is one of the defining characteristics of a civilized society that torture isn't allowed. Those that do are not considered well by more evolved members of the world community.
Confessions extracted by torture are not considered reliable. It is possible to make any human being in the world confess to anything.
I note your post addresses none of these considerations, is instead an ad hominem attack, the kind of thing one might expect from someone who espouses torture.
Think about it.
Arf
Current Events » in reply to Whereas you, of course, know that it was all an 'inside job'
Re: The rationale for torture.
The whole thread (53 posts)
- From your CIA and DoD: "Military: Suspected 9/11 mastermind confessed"
- I also helped Oswald shoot JFK, if anyone's interested... (n/t)
- Oops! Nabbed and tortured the wrong Mohammed
- A question on torture...
- He killed 3,000+ people on 9/11.
- After three years of torture he finally signed at the dotted line as requested. (n/t)
- Whereas you, of course, know that it was all an 'inside job'
