According to the article you linked:
"After ExxonMobil was chastised by senators for giving $19 million over the years to the Competitive Enterprise Institute and others who are "producing very questionable data" on climate change, as Sen. Jay Rockefeller said, the company has cut back its support for such groups."
And:
"With its change of heart, ExxonMobil is more likely to win a place at the negotiating table as Congress debates climate legislation. "
So, ExxonMobil is a oil company. And after the Lefty senators threaten them, apparently according to the article, they now playing nice to the Dems.
But I guess this is no argument against the claim oil companies are greedy [unless giving money to Dems automatically makes you not greedy].
Anyhow, I found nothing of any scientific or historic value [or surprising or interesting] in the article. Though obviously, I realize that wasn't actually the purpose of the article.
Flame » in reply to did you notice your entire post here is meaningless dribble?
re: did you notice your entire post here is meaningless dribble?
The whole thread (26 posts)
- The history of the Global Warming denialists
- Also from Newsweek, in 1975
- .. and, did you notice?
- re: Speaking of Global Warming history
- The same people saw Saddam as a threat, democracy for Iraq.
- Complaining can now get you arrested in the UK....as a "terrorist"
- also from Newsweek