Geez…
You post a site that is extremely anti-Bush and call that documenting lies? And then you clarify it with; “Somehow I don't think I'm going to convince you if you haven't come to the conclusion yourself yet.†Geez.
You just did what you accuse Tom of doing half the time. I was hoping you were going to site a bias legal document.
I’ll grant you there are probably some lies Bush may have made but no more than most every president has in the past. A lot of nit picking going on there at that site and I’m not going to waste my time.
The same old lied about WMD, Yellow Cake and so forth are just not true. It was the intelligence that went bad, not lies from Bush. Bush didn’t have to make anything up as intelligence was flowing in from everywhere including around the world from other leaders. Sure Bush made some mistakes, but he didn’t lie, everything was handed to him and he just went with it. The proof is that there are no impeachment hearings. The democrat leaders know they can’t impeach Bush because he didn’t lie, just went with sour intelligence.
Sorry I asked.
Current Events » in reply to Just did a Google search
re: Geez…
The whole thread (33 posts)
- Timing of the attack on Iran. Follow the aircraft carriers.
- Bird farm boogie-woogie
- re: Follow the aircraft carriers.
- Last time they hadn't prepared the population yet.
- BTW - Russia and China have formed a military alliance. Iran an "associate".
- You are aware you're just making this up as you go along? (n/t)
- No, I wasn't. Which parts? (n/t)
- re: No, I wasn't. Which parts?
- BTW - Iran with nuclear power = WW III. Mad. Insanity. Unless - - -
- Confession. I made up the parts labeled as conjecture. (n/t)
- re: Confession
- Comparison
- "The only thing crazier than a stark raving mad nut is..." (n/t)
- re: Confession
- re: No, I wasn't. Which parts?
- No, I wasn't. Which parts? (n/t)
- Last time they hadn't prepared the population yet.
