Do not get so upset, I am simply asking questions in order to better understand both sides of the controversy.
ARRhELL seems to be saying that anyone seeing something that is flying, does not look like anything that is manmade or natural, and behaves in an unusual manner must be crazy.
You at least admit that these people that see strange things are not crazy, but you are saying that they are mistaking or misidentifying what they see.
Then both of you, more or less, attacked the writer of the information by implying that everything that he has written is a lie.
You claim that there is no evidence that intelligent life can exist anywhere else in the universe, similarly I claim that there is no evidence that they can not exist.
It seems to me that you are far more adamant in insisting that they can not exist than I am in my observation that they might exist.
I have not seen the Merv Griffin Show where Gordon Cooper is reported as saying:
I would like to see the time when all qualified people could really work together to properly investigate these stories and either refute or prove them.</block quote>
But I whole heartedly agree with that assessment.
As an amateur radio operator I can assure that it is possible for a “Ham†to listen to the NASA transmissions.