Oh, I know you care. I also know, from observation and experience, that you don't know how to behave in the context of how the other person feels.
You tell everyone that emotion is a primitive response even when emotion is appropriate, unless you have been smacked in a tender (for you) place, and then you lash out. Then emotion is OK. We've seen it happen.
I spend a lot of time empathizing with people IRL, because it's the only way to understand their questions and their needs. It's my job, my family role, and my hobby. I expect the same kind of treatment, and I have two choices when I don't get it. I'm tired of smacking people in the face with a wet dishtowel, because (as you point out, in your way) becoming reactive only makes me behave like the individual who has offended me. So the other option, ignoring the person, becomes the default.
It's the way I am.
Flame » in reply to Thank you Mary Anne.
You're welcome, Tech.
The whole thread (39 posts)
- On notice
- The only pussy I see around here is you.
- Stop flattering yourself.
- I'm not talking about me you dolt
- Rove's Playbook is the same one as Harry Ried and Nancy Pelosi's
- re: I'm not talking about me you dolt
- Let him go for it
- re: Let him go for it
- "Humanity"
- The sterility of binary logic
- Ever looked up the definitions of "psychopath" and "sociopath"?
- Humanity = emotions over intelligence
- Framing again
- Let him go for it
- I'm not talking about me you dolt
