Maybe a few athletes when they win their medals will refuse to wear them...

TAFKASE — 4/10/2008 2:30:06 PM (archived)

The IOC will probably then take the medals away and award them to others who did not win their events.

Time will tell which athletes will have the courage to recognize that winning isn't about the medal.

The whole thread (39 posts)

Silence here on HZ about the Olympic shame, I mean flame. - Jacob - 4/9/2008 7:06:13 PM
- Let the Games end - Fox - 4/10/2008 5:09:13 PM
- IOC Chief speaks to the issue. - TAFKASE - 4/10/2008 3:43:49 PM
- re: Silence here on HZ about the Olympic shame, I mean flame. - REB - 4/10/2008 2:16:54 PM
  - Yes - TAFKASE - 4/10/2008 2:24:45 PM
    - Maybe a few athletes when they win their medals will refuse to wear them... - TAFKASE - 4/10/2008 2:30:06 PM
      - I see Burma has already been forgotten - Socrates II - 4/10/2008 2:53:31 PM
        
        China has a role to play with that one too. - TAFKASE - 4/10/2008 3:02:30 PM
- Communist countries and the Olympics - azstrummer - 4/9/2008 8:38:45 PM
  - Just posted - azstrummer - 4/10/2008 3:45:39 AM
    - Interesting concept - TB - 4/10/2008 6:17:08 AM
      - re: Poster children - Fox - 4/10/2008 5:19:35 PM
        
        Doesn't really answer my question. - TB - 4/10/2008 6:23:36 PM
      - re: Interesting concept - REB - 4/10/2008 2:26:02 PM
        
        because it's easy - azstrummer - 4/10/2008 3:42:03 PM
      - Hint: It has to do with the labor union constituancy - TAFKASE - 4/10/2008 1:41:28 PM
  - Great thought regarding Carter. - Bowser - 4/9/2008 11:09:48 PM
    - So Tiananmen Square, 1989, was just a 'bump' in the road for Red China? (n/t) - Jacob - 4/10/2008 1:33:46 PM
      - Show me a government that doesn't react with force to the threat of overthrow. (n/t) - Bowser - 4/10/2008 4:25:27 PM
        
        So the police in Selma were justified? - TAFKASE - 4/10/2008 4:44:24 PM
        
        Just where did that statement talk about right or wrong, good or bad? (n/t) - Bowser - 4/10/2008 5:36:23 PM
  - There is NO Tibet. - Lee - 4/9/2008 10:42:59 PM
    - There was no Austria, either, between 1938 -1945. (n/t) - Jacob - 4/10/2008 1:35:08 PM
      - Austria willing joined with Germany. - Lee - 4/10/2008 5:02:27 PM
    - There's a Tibet like there is a Texas. - Bowser - 4/9/2008 11:11:48 PM
      - Tibet had bad karma. - Lee - 4/10/2008 1:35:34 AM
        
        I do have to agree with you that Tibet would have been taken over by the Soviets had the Chinese not done so. - TAFKASE - 4/10/2008 1:45:01 PM
        
        And your sources for believing that? - Bowser - 4/10/2008 5:38:52 PM
        
        It's a little more complicated than that. - TB - 4/10/2008 7:05:12 PM
        
        Red China wasn't satisfied with just grabbing Tibet, it wants Taiwan, too. (n/t) - Jacob - 4/10/2008 1:38:32 PM
        
        Taiwan is Chinese even more than Hawaii is American. - Bowser - 4/10/2008 5:41:42 PM
        
        Missed the point. Tibet is a province of China, and has been for a long time. (n/t) - Bowser - 4/10/2008 2:18:25 AM
        
        True, that's my point too. - Lee - 4/10/2008 4:42:42 AM
        
        People said that about apartheid too. (n/t) - alcaray - 4/10/2008 6:05:15 PM
        
        More like polar opposites. - Lee - 4/10/2008 9:52:30 PM
        
        Seems like the and equivalent set of protesters to me, rather than polar opposites. - alcaray - 4/11/2008 4:11:00 AM
        
        Good grief! "the and" should be "an". (n/t) - alcaray - 4/11/2008 4:12:04 AM
  - Jacques Rogge said the same thing! (n/t) - Raoul - 4/9/2008 8:56:51 PM
- My apologies; I noticed REB's post on this topic down below. (n/t) - Jacob - 4/9/2008 7:08:29 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (39 posts)