re: Poster children
I'm still trying to figure out why the American Left has fixated on Tibet as the Poster Nation for oppression by tyranny.
Naturally, the American Right would only elevate a country to that status if it had "strategic resources" within its borders... and would only try to do something about it if said country were perceived as a military pushover.
The oppression of Tibet has a religious basis. Do you not see the inconsistency in supporting Israel's self-determination, but not Tibet's?
