None of the 'scholarly' articles have a damn thing to do with the pseudoscience you are trying to sell
My post was guilty of generalization - obviously not every infinite logarithmic spiral in nature is Phi. I should have made that more clear.
You were haping on and on about phi because you thought it lent your bullshit credibility- you were parisitically attaching your nonsense to real science and mathematics that you dont understand hoping people would swallow it. This indicates that you KNOW that you are spouting unsupportable fantasy and are dishonestly trying to dress it ip to make it appear respectable.
It won't work.
You have been exposed as a delusional ignorant fool yet again.
