Each point in that load of rants would take a paragraph or two to fisk properly.
A few comments, though (I'm packing for a trip)
Two trillion for the Iraq War? I would have thought the Left had inflated that number to forty trillion by now, having incorporated all the CO2 damage that a prosperous Iraq will do to the world of the future. The real numbers, of course, suggest comparisons with other expenditures. Like the bailout.
The only people screaming "socialism" about what the government is doing with the banks are the leftists and liberals here. This is because they have no idea what the word actually means, I suppose. It seems to be defined by some people as "government taking over something I don't approve of them taking over." Hence posts like Bowser's below.
Anyone who's pushing nationalized health care while screaming about balancing the budget has no brain. It is probably pointless to argue with them. Medicare and Medicaid have already socialized a huge chunk of the system, and economists almost universally point to Medicare as the one thing that will bust our budget in the future.
The words "eight years" get tossed around a lot on the economy lately. Like Bowser, you seem to have eliminated all memory of four post-tax-cut years of employment growth, increasing tax revenues, and economic expansion. That wasn't all based on housing prices.
Obama's real politics will be crucial if he wins. The politics of the leaders of the House, where most legislation originates, are well-known. I am still astounded that the political party Palin's husband once belonged to is news, but Obama's New Party membership isn't. Of course, you might be one of those who thinks it's about frigging time we get a Tom Hayden type into the White House, but I bet you would still be among a small minority of Americans.
Current Events » in reply to In other words, don't answer a single point.
That's how the MOAB technique works.
The whole thread (58 posts)
- Florida Republicans notice that early voting favors Democrats...
- Ummmm..... Did I mention that the democrats are socialists?
- Hey - a lot of them are communists. And don't forget the fascists.
- re: Ummmm..... Aww, shucks that we'll have to pay for all thos promises that O'B; promises, but....
- "it takes a bit of critical thinking. ..."
- Using your logic....
- How can you talk about debt? What chutzpah!
- Why can't any of you righties explain to me
- My answers to your quiz.
- re: Why can't any of you righties explain to me
- Ah. The "Bowser Verbal MOAB" technique.
- Ah, the "TB's got nothing" technique (n/t)
- In other words, don't answer a single point.
- What about Bush nationalizing the financial system? Obama isn't that far left.
- re: Ummmm..... Aww, shucks that we'll have to pay for all thos promises that O'B; promises, but....
- And as for 'critical thinking'
- re: And as for 'critical thinking'
- Your answer, Like TB
- re: And as for 'critical thinking'... more critical thinking.
- re: And as for 'critical thinking'... more critical thinking. Again, why did Powell stop running for the presidency? (n/t)
- As I recall, the speculation at the time was that his wife was adamantly against it.
- re: As I recall, the speculation at the time was that his wife was adamantly against it.
- wasn't speculation, Powell said as much in his autobiography (n/t)
- It saddens me that you are not willing to allow that Obama wants to serve his country.
- re: As I recall, the speculation at the time was that his wife was adamantly against it.
- re: As I recall, the speculation at the time was that his wife was adamantly against it.
- As I recall, the speculation at the time was that his wife was adamantly against it.
- re: And as for 'critical thinking'... more critical thinking. Again, why did Powell stop running for the presidency? (n/t)
- re: And as for 'critical thinking'
- And as for 'critical thinking'
- re: Ummmm..... Aww, shucks that we'll have to pay for all those promises that O'B; promises, but.... (n/t)
- Ummmm..... Did I mention that the democrats are socialists?
