"You aren't even thinking about the cue cards any more. You're just reading them."

So let me get this straight- you have taken the marching orders from your masters on every topic from Wright, to Ayers, To now the panicked chant of 'SOCIALISM!!!!'... And now you want to crucify me For sounding remotely close to the rhetoric of the democratic party? You, who switched form 'WMD' to 'Democracy in Iraq' to 'Stable friendly power' to 'Oh, Hai! Lookie! The Surge is working, that makes it all OkieDokie!'- you are going to take that tac with me? The walking wikipedia entry on 'Right Wing Butt Monkey' himself? The man who hasn't met a Right wing talking point he hasn't personally fellated since 2003?

Sorry, thats not going to fly here.

"Oh, man, the way you stick your chin out. No wonder you get so pissed when you wake up under the bar table."

Right, and right now you are so busy boogy-ing your touchdown dance you have not even noticed you're nowhere near the end-zone. Maybe in your own mind you're winnoing these points left and right, but thats about the only place (Oh, aside from Lee and SDAI! Lest we forget that Duo of Intellectual prowess!) where your scoring points off of me, or quite frankly anyone else- Bowser included.

As for the Rest- my logic is just fine, thank you. The right wing agenda has a series of proposals, many of them social plans (remember that medicare expnsion?) and at least one pointless unecessary 2 trillion dollar war, and their method of funding them has been budget deficits and debt. The Democratic plan has different proposals- among them ending the unnecessary war, and attempting to bolster the budget by rolling back tax breaks on the wealthiest few. Its pretty much insane to call one agenda SOCIALISM!!11!!! while the other clean and spotless. Someones going to have to pay for this war and this massive expansion of the federal government thats taken place under the republican administration. Its a redistribution of wealth in exactly the same sense, except the tab is just kicked down the road.

So, cry me a river, mr talking hand. Why don't you reach back into your sack of talking points and see if there is something you have not gotten around to using yet, because I'm sure as hell bored with the bilge you've been regurgitating here. No more Ayers, no more Wright, no more ACORN. If you can't think of some objection without the help of your masters, then at least change the spew every now and then.

Yeti