Flame » in reply to There was and is no 'debate'.

The whole thread (48 posts)

• No to AGW thread moved to flame, sorry (n/t) - Raoul moderating - 11/25/2008 4:58:46 PM
  • On modelling... - nick hoffman - 12/2/2008 11:17:13 PM
    • re: On modelling... - S - 12/3/2008 6:25:23 PM
  • Why? - Marsby - 11/27/2008 10:09:53 PM
  • Completely unjustified.... (n/t) - ARRELL - 11/25/2008 5:03:47 PM
    • Maybe if you learn to debate in a more civil tone. (n/t) - Lee - 11/25/2008 6:17:02 PM
      • LOL - ARRELL - 11/26/2008 9:36:19 AM
        • How many times have I been suspended for harassment and bad chat form? - Lee - 11/26/2008 5:03:24 PM
          • Yep, instead you cunningly milk the system for all it's worth - ! - 11/27/2008 2:44:20 PM
            • No, I know how to debate an issue. - Lee - 11/28/2008 3:25:47 AM
              • - a perfect example of the point made above (n/t) - ! - 11/28/2008 4:58:37 AM
                • Welcome to the arena of ideas. - Lee - 11/28/2008 3:43:39 PM
                  • QED (n/t) - ! - 11/29/2008 3:09:42 AM
          • I've done it quite a few times, Lee. - Bowser - 11/27/2008 12:32:26 AM
          • Not enough certainly (n/t) - azstrummer - 11/26/2008 10:27:03 PM
      • There was and is no 'debate'. - Post Sputnik - 11/25/2008 6:32:58 PM
        • Thank you for sharing your dogma. - Lee - 11/25/2008 11:53:12 PM
        • re: There was and is no 'debate'. - S - 11/25/2008 9:35:05 PM
          • Anyone that takes 'S' seriously should do a little research on his 'source'...The very fact that this is the best you can come up with proves my point.... - ARRELL - 11/26/2008 7:37:53 AM
          • A July 2007 review of 539 abstracts - Post Sputnik - 11/26/2008 12:10:04 AM
            • Does that apply to Oreskes, too? (n/t) - TB - 11/27/2008 9:06:00 PM
              • If you don't express yourself and link to evidence ... - Post Sputnik - 11/28/2008 12:01:15 AM
                • re: If you don't express yourself - TB - 11/28/2008 12:22:14 AM
                  • re: If you don't express yourself - Post Sputnik - 11/28/2008 2:04:35 AM
                    • Wiki - TB - 11/28/2008 2:16:40 AM
                      • That was vandalism, Tom - pwokenyaw - 11/28/2008 10:34:34 PM
                        • Made my point, though. - TB - 11/29/2008 1:33:38 AM
                          • Not hardly - your vandalism was quickly deleted. - pwokenyaw - 11/30/2008 8:02:17 PM
                            • The issue... - TB - 12/1/2008 5:18:36 AM
                              • re: The issue... - Post Sputnik - 12/2/2008 3:58:28 AM
                                • re: The issue... - pwokenyaw - 12/3/2008 6:09:25 PM
                            • TB - A Liar And Proud Of It - Post Sputnik - 12/1/2008 3:25:11 AM
          • nice quote from the endicrinologist you have there - pwokenyaw - 11/25/2008 10:14:32 PM
            • Is being an endocrinologist significant in itself? - TB - 11/26/2008 2:30:25 AM
              • Yes - Marsby - 11/27/2008 7:31:36 PM
                • There's that "expert" again. - TB - 11/27/2008 9:16:23 PM
                  • You're Confused - Marsby - 11/28/2008 1:57:00 AM
                    • re: You're Confused - gbaikie - 11/28/2008 8:56:01 AM
                      • You Are Full Of BS - Marsby - 12/1/2008 5:46:46 AM
                        • re: You Are Full Of BS - gbaikie - 12/1/2008 9:46:22 AM
                    • re: You're Confused - gbaikie - 11/28/2008 7:23:37 AM
                      • re: You're Confused - Marsby - 12/1/2008 5:32:13 AM
                        • re: You're Confused - gbaikie - 12/1/2008 9:27:21 AM
              • and back we go again to the evolution debate - pwokenyaw - 11/26/2008 5:16:30 AM
                • Evolution - Post Sputnik - 11/27/2008 9:18:03 AM
              • oh to be a watchmaker ;) - Brian Gyles - 11/26/2008 4:03:58 AM
            • should've been "endocrinologist" (n/t) - pwokenyaw - 11/26/2008 12:02:15 AM
              • Actually, I kind of like "endicrinologist". (n/t) - ER - 11/26/2008 12:35:03 AM