If you don't express yourself and link to evidence ...

Flame » in reply to Does that apply to Oreskes, too?

If you don't express yourself and link to evidence ...

Post Sputnik — 11/28/2008 12:01:15 AM (archived)

Then nobody can possibly take you seriously Brosz.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Oreskes

compared to :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Monckton

Can you see the difference? Didn't think so.

Try :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_(journal)

compared to :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_Public_Policy_Institute

Let me guess, you still can't see the difference between these two approaches to evidence of a consensus. I'm guessing you don't even know the difference between 'consensus' and 'evidence', not to mention 'quackery' and 'peer review', or 'peer review' and 'essay'. It's not your fault, Brosz, you have faulty wiring.

The whole thread (48 posts)

No to AGW thread moved to flame, sorry (n/t) - Raoul moderating - 11/25/2008 4:58:46 PM
- On modelling... - nick hoffman - 12/2/2008 11:17:13 PM
  - re: On modelling... - S - 12/3/2008 6:25:23 PM
- Why? - Marsby - 11/27/2008 10:09:53 PM
- Completely unjustified.... (n/t) - ARRELL - 11/25/2008 5:03:47 PM
  - Maybe if you learn to debate in a more civil tone. (n/t) - Lee - 11/25/2008 6:17:02 PM
    - LOL - ARRELL - 11/26/2008 9:36:19 AM
      - How many times have I been suspended for harassment and bad chat form? - Lee - 11/26/2008 5:03:24 PM
        
        Yep, instead you cunningly milk the system for all it's worth - ! - 11/27/2008 2:44:20 PM
        
        No, I know how to debate an issue. - Lee - 11/28/2008 3:25:47 AM
        
        - a perfect example of the point made above (n/t) - ! - 11/28/2008 4:58:37 AM
        
        Welcome to the arena of ideas. - Lee - 11/28/2008 3:43:39 PM
        
        QED (n/t) - ! - 11/29/2008 3:09:42 AM
        
        I've done it quite a few times, Lee. - Bowser - 11/27/2008 12:32:26 AM
        
        Not enough certainly (n/t) - azstrummer - 11/26/2008 10:27:03 PM
    - There was and is no 'debate'. - Post Sputnik - 11/25/2008 6:32:58 PM
      - Thank you for sharing your dogma. - Lee - 11/25/2008 11:53:12 PM
      - re: There was and is no 'debate'. - S - 11/25/2008 9:35:05 PM
        
        Anyone that takes 'S' seriously should do a little research on his 'source'...The very fact that this is the best you can come up with proves my point.... - ARRELL - 11/26/2008 7:37:53 AM
        
        A July 2007 review of 539 abstracts - Post Sputnik - 11/26/2008 12:10:04 AM
        
        Does that apply to Oreskes, too? (n/t) - TB - 11/27/2008 9:06:00 PM
        
        If you don't express yourself and link to evidence ... - Post Sputnik - 11/28/2008 12:01:15 AM
        
        re: If you don't express yourself - TB - 11/28/2008 12:22:14 AM
        
        re: If you don't express yourself - Post Sputnik - 11/28/2008 2:04:35 AM
        
        Wiki - TB - 11/28/2008 2:16:40 AM
        
        That was vandalism, Tom - pwokenyaw - 11/28/2008 10:34:34 PM
        
        Made my point, though. - TB - 11/29/2008 1:33:38 AM
        
        Not hardly - your vandalism was quickly deleted. - pwokenyaw - 11/30/2008 8:02:17 PM
        
        The issue... - TB - 12/1/2008 5:18:36 AM
        
        re: The issue... - Post Sputnik - 12/2/2008 3:58:28 AM
        
        re: The issue... - pwokenyaw - 12/3/2008 6:09:25 PM
        
        TB - A Liar And Proud Of It - Post Sputnik - 12/1/2008 3:25:11 AM
        
        nice quote from the endicrinologist you have there - pwokenyaw - 11/25/2008 10:14:32 PM
        
        Is being an endocrinologist significant in itself? - TB - 11/26/2008 2:30:25 AM
        
        Yes - Marsby - 11/27/2008 7:31:36 PM
        
        There's that "expert" again. - TB - 11/27/2008 9:16:23 PM
        
        You're Confused - Marsby - 11/28/2008 1:57:00 AM
        
        re: You're Confused - gbaikie - 11/28/2008 8:56:01 AM
        
        You Are Full Of BS - Marsby - 12/1/2008 5:46:46 AM
        
        re: You Are Full Of BS - gbaikie - 12/1/2008 9:46:22 AM
        
        re: You're Confused - gbaikie - 11/28/2008 7:23:37 AM
        
        re: You're Confused - Marsby - 12/1/2008 5:32:13 AM
        
        re: You're Confused - gbaikie - 12/1/2008 9:27:21 AM
        
        and back we go again to the evolution debate - pwokenyaw - 11/26/2008 5:16:30 AM
        
        Evolution - Post Sputnik - 11/27/2008 9:18:03 AM
        
        oh to be a watchmaker ;) - Brian Gyles - 11/26/2008 4:03:58 AM
        
        should've been "endocrinologist" (n/t) - pwokenyaw - 11/26/2008 12:02:15 AM
        
        Actually, I kind of like "endicrinologist". (n/t) - ER - 11/26/2008 12:35:03 AM

Recent posts

The whole thread (48 posts)