"One of the stupidest arguments I've seen made here and elsewhere is that unless you are a certified "climate scientist," your thinking and opinions have no significance. This gag has been used to nullify many sources."
1. Certified Definition
vouched for; guaranteed, having, or attested to by, a certificate
2. Opinion Definition
a belief not based on absolute certainty or positive knowledge but on what seems true, valid, or probable to one's own mind; judgment an evaluation, impression, or estimation of the quality or worth of a person or thing the formal judgment of an expert on a matter in which advice is sought Law the formal statement by a judge, court referee, etc. of the law bearing on a case
3. Scientist Definition
a specialist in science; esp., a person whose profession is investigating in one of the natural sciences, as biology, chemistry, physics, etc.
4. Theory Definition
Obsolete a mental viewing; contemplation
a speculative idea or plan as to how something might be done
a systematic statement of principles involved the theory of equations in mathematics
a formulation of apparent relationships or underlying principles of certain observed phenomena which has been verified to some degree
that branch of an art or science consisting in a knowledge of its principles and methods rather than in its practice; pure, as opposed to applied, science, etc.
popularly a mere conjecture, or guess
>>>>> okay my point <<<<<<
Scientist investigate and express there Opinion based on the strongiest theory that the facts point to. Not all roads lead to Rome.
so I think its nice if we respect each others Opinions and learn what we can and form our own understanding. Science is not cast in stone just a page with space for additonal notes.
lets all learn together
on a foot note I'm always right ;)
Flame » in reply to Is being an endocrinologist significant in itself?
oh to be a watchmaker ;)
The whole thread (48 posts)
- No to AGW thread moved to flame, sorry (n/t)
- On modelling...
- Why?
- Completely unjustified.... (n/t)
- Maybe if you learn to debate in a more civil tone. (n/t)
- LOL
- There was and is no 'debate'.
- Thank you for sharing your dogma.
- re: There was and is no 'debate'.
- Anyone that takes 'S' seriously should do a little research on his 'source'...The very fact that this is the best you can come up with proves my point....
- A July 2007 review of 539 abstracts
- nice quote from the endicrinologist you have there
- Maybe if you learn to debate in a more civil tone. (n/t)
