Made my point, though.
The idea that Wikipedia is somehow an unbiased and totally accurate source is nuts. I find Wikipedia useful as a central point where I can locate links to original material. No different than Drudge, when it comes down to it.
Many entries, particularly in controversial arenas, seem run by a clique of people who monitor and control the content. How the entry turns out depends on how much control they have.
I put a quick joke in to make a point. If I had decided to go full bore and begin putting in serious analysis or other references, I think you might have seen an interesting process.
Another opinion on this here.