Your last post is full of false hoods which should be obvious from many previous posts fom many here. You are either a liar, self deluded or an idiot. There is no point in discussing this further until you are willing to be honest either with me or yourself.
For example:
Science is built on quantifiable information and to suggest otherwise shows you are far more scientifically ignorant than I thought. Your laughable claim to be scientifically proving something by making many false statements without any numbers to back them up suggests that was no typo on your part.
CO2 is not as strong a greenhouse gas compared as some others such as methane, but is a far stronger greenhouse gas than the primary componants of our atmosphere so your point is both misleading and irrelevant.
"That the rate of change of CO2 in the atmosphere do not exactly relate to the amount of CO2 humans emit into the atmosphere- it's not even close or in the ballpark." Where's your math or source for this? I disagree 100%.
Regards,
Mark
Flame » in reply to re: You're Confused
You Are Full Of BS
The whole thread (48 posts)
- No to AGW thread moved to flame, sorry (n/t)
- On modelling...
- Why?
- Completely unjustified.... (n/t)
- Maybe if you learn to debate in a more civil tone. (n/t)
- LOL
- There was and is no 'debate'.
- Thank you for sharing your dogma.
- re: There was and is no 'debate'.
- Anyone that takes 'S' seriously should do a little research on his 'source'...The very fact that this is the best you can come up with proves my point....
- A July 2007 review of 539 abstracts
- nice quote from the endicrinologist you have there
- Maybe if you learn to debate in a more civil tone. (n/t)