They both came at the same time.
Pretend time doesn't exist. Then one can see that everything in existence or "will be" in existence from our temporal perspective here on Earth already is in existence.
Tomorrow has already happened. The "new" idea someone will have next week already exists. Obama's inauguration has already happened. Everyone in the world is playing out preconceived expressions of energy.
The universe holds all the cards and it doesn't matter which ones we grab - it knows how that hand plays out.
I know it makes ones head hurt to wrap it around a timeless universe with no ending and no beginning and all motion being solely relative comparisons between and components of said universe.
Once one does though...it all fits into place.
;-)
Off Topic » in reply to Which came first?
The answer is actually simple.
The whole thread (42 posts)
- A suggestion of mine for any theoretical physicist lurking.
- It depends on the density of matter.
- Is there no room for learning, differing opinions, even errors on the Space board?
- Limits
- I think maximum T is determined by the maximum number of angels that can dance on a hydrogen atom. (n/t)
- Total Codswallop
- Upper limits
- That should be 9.0 x 10^20 ergs / gram.in the derivation (n/t)