Upper limits

Off Topic » in reply to A suggestion of mine for any theoretical physicist lurking.

Upper limits

TB — 1/10/2009 2:20:53 AM (archived)

At some point you get out of the realm of "temperature" and get into plasma physics and particle physics. At this point, the term "specific heat" doesn't really work any more, but I'm no expert.

The whole thread (42 posts)

A suggestion of mine for any theoretical physicist lurking. - Jacob - 1/9/2009 7:13:31 PM
- It depends on the density of matter. - David F Mayer - 1/27/2009 1:47:25 AM
- Is there no room for learning, differing opinions, even errors on the Space board? - Bowser - 1/14/2009 5:48:38 AM
  - Which came first? - Lindy - 1/16/2009 1:41:35 AM
    - The answer is actually simple. - SDAI-Tech1 - 1/16/2009 10:38:52 PM
    - re: Which came first? - nick hoffman - 1/16/2009 11:43:16 AM
      - Well said (New theory?) - Lindy - 1/16/2009 6:26:36 PM
  - In my opinion a turning point came in the last day or two. - Space Moderator Nick - 1/14/2009 9:44:38 AM
    - re:I agree with Bowser - Johannes - 1/15/2009 2:46:40 AM
      - Without disagreeing with Nick's call, there's a fine line there I'm having trouble identifying. - Bowser - 1/16/2009 1:20:00 AM
      - You can agree with whoever you like - Space Moderator Nick - 1/16/2009 12:40:11 AM
        
        re: Nick, your thoughts are interesting indeed - Johannes - 1/19/2009 4:57:24 AM
- Limits - SDAI-Tech1 - 1/11/2009 2:02:35 AM
  - re: movement of energy - Johannes - 1/11/2009 9:04:46 PM
    - Energy - SDAI-Tech1 - 1/14/2009 12:41:09 AM
      - re: Energy - REB - 1/15/2009 6:45:13 PM
        
        re: I think that I understand your view point also, but - Johannes - 1/20/2009 2:58:49 AM
      - re: Thank you, I think I understand your view now. - Johannes - 1/15/2009 2:29:20 AM
- I think maximum T is determined by the maximum number of angels that can dance on a hydrogen atom. (n/t) - Laurie Street - 1/10/2009 6:49:37 PM
  - Cute. - Jacob - 1/10/2009 7:33:37 PM
- Total Codswallop - nick hoffman - 1/10/2009 4:13:48 AM
  - Learn about the Lorentz transformation - Nick Hoffman - 1/12/2009 2:08:52 AM
  - You are an idiot if you believe anything can move faster than C. - Jacob - 1/10/2009 5:17:02 PM
    - Don't be dense - Adam - 1/11/2009 1:08:17 AM
    - re: You are an idiot if you believe anything can move faster than C. - lance - 1/11/2009 12:04:51 AM
      - re: My opinion is that - Johannes - 1/11/2009 6:55:31 PM
        
        re: My opinion is that - gbaikie - 1/12/2009 12:07:18 AM
        
        re: Paradox ?? - Johannes - 1/12/2009 2:49:37 AM
        
        re: Paradox ?? - gbaikie - 1/12/2009 6:07:11 AM
        
        re: Paradox ?? - Johannes - 1/13/2009 3:40:45 AM
        
        re: Paradox ?? - gbaikie - 1/13/2009 5:49:45 AM
        
        re: Hmmm.... Les see, multiplying the - Johannes - 1/15/2009 1:44:54 AM
        
        re: Hmmm.... Les see, multiplying the - gbaikie - 1/15/2009 5:56:32 AM
        
        re: Hmmm.... Les see, multiplying the - gbaikie - 1/15/2009 7:11:56 AM
        
        re: re Yes it's 299,792,458 m/s. (n/t) - Johannes - 1/19/2009 5:13:53 AM
- Upper limits - TB - 1/10/2009 2:20:53 AM
  - You still have to deal witH the limit known as" C". (n/t) - Jacob - 1/10/2009 5:18:15 PM
    - re: You still have to deal with the limit known as" C". - TB - 1/10/2009 6:34:13 PM
      - re: You still have to deal with the limit known as" C". - gbaikie - 1/10/2009 11:55:04 PM
      - Sorry--units should be degrees K. (n/t) - TB - 1/10/2009 6:35:04 PM
        
        Either way, a limit is a limit is a limit. - Jacob - 1/10/2009 7:29:19 PM
- That should be 9.0 x 10^20 ergs / gram.in the derivation (n/t) - Jacob - 1/9/2009 7:18:01 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (42 posts)