"I never believed once that Iran didn't want the bomb. They'd be stupid not to want one. Have you noticed the common denominator for countries we invade is that they do not possess them? My contention was always that, if they did get one, they couldn't use it and it would probably make them less of a threat."

How many countries other than Iran are being stupid not to want a nuclear bomb?

Perhaps, the nuclear non-proliferation treaty has been the wrong way doing this?
Should we simply somehow get rid of this treaty?
Perhaps we should give Iran some of our nuclear weapons- after all there are fair number of Americans who think we don't need the large number we have.
And why should we have Iran waste it's resources trying to build inferior nukes, when we have such an excessive surplus?

Or it could be argued that Iran is unique. How many centuries have the Russians wanted a warm water port. Perhaps that fact alone should make Iran required to have nukes.
Or is it the imperial ambition of Iran that is the more important factor?

Now, Haiti is actually a country the US has invaded, so perhaps according to azstrummer doctrine it needs nukes. How about Cuba? Maybe Colombia's real problem is it doesn't have nuclear weapons. Then we have Indonesia and of course all the African countries.

I think azstrummer has resolved the problem to reduce world conflict- somehow get all these countries which are involved in conflict to be armed with nukes.