Your post was quite cogent until it got to the phrase "Here's what science today misses." That was the understatement of the year. You started babbling about EMF fields and other spooky manifestations of vortical aura. Electromagnetic radiation and nuclear radiation have nothing in common, one is an electron shell phenomenon, the other comes from the atomic nucleus.
Transporting radioactive waste is extremely dangerous because of the potential of accidental spils, train wrecks, terrorist attack, etc. But EMF? Or maybe you meant ElectroMotive Force? That's another word for voltage.
C'mon Techie, you MUST know that. And if you don't, you're smart enough to not let anyone find out you don't. Is this some kind of test, or what? Are you trying to trip us up, or do you just want to know if anyone is still reading your posts?
Off Topic » in reply to The problem is...
A very reasonable analysis
The whole thread (34 posts)
- "$13 billion later, nuclear waste site at dead end."
- This method of dealing with nuclear waste is apparently obsolete.
- The problem is...
- It is frustrating. I see nothing technically wrong with this site.
- PS