"Coming nuclear renaissance"

TB — 3/30/2009 12:05:41 AM (archived)

Another optimistic view on the prospects of nuclear power.

I hope we see more on this from the current administration than lip service. The "stimulus" bill, last time I looked, did not even contain the word "nuclear." Not much on nuclear power and reactor research in the Obama budget, either.

The whole thread (18 posts)

"Coming nuclear renaissance" - TB - 3/30/2009 12:05:41 AM
- Funny how the global warming folks never mention nuclear electricity - E.P. - 4/3/2009 8:33:44 PM
- Another Waste of Money. We have put a trillion dollars into nuclear research already. - David F Mayer - 3/31/2009 12:36:39 PM
  - re: Waste - TB - 3/31/2009 3:25:07 PM
    - Sorry to disagree, but you are mistaken about need for local sources. - David F Mayer - 4/1/2009 1:27:31 AM
- I think a lot of the objections to nuclear power will evaporate. - Bowser - 3/30/2009 3:19:08 AM
  - Again, given that, why should the Feds pay for anything? - TB - 3/30/2009 3:38:40 AM
    - Tell me why the Feds should buy a private power company a nuclear plant? - Bowser - 3/30/2009 4:54:28 AM
      - "Conservatives"? There you go again. (n/t) - Ronald Reagan - 3/31/2009 1:50:44 AM
- Unequivocal - McFly - 3/30/2009 12:33:26 AM
  - Industry has never footed the whole bill for nuclear power. - ER - 3/30/2009 12:42:18 AM
    - As long as we're consistent about it. - TB - 3/30/2009 1:57:36 AM
      - If you actually had read my post... - ER - 3/30/2009 9:43:16 AM
        
        An aside - TB - 3/30/2009 1:43:30 PM
        
        Energy is just one factor, - ER - 3/30/2009 7:18:02 PM
        
        The response was more to McFly than you. Sorry. (n/t) - TB - 3/30/2009 1:32:58 PM
      - Hopefully? - McFly - 3/30/2009 2:42:34 AM
        
        Red herring? Why? - TB - 3/30/2009 3:11:57 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (18 posts)