Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to When you assert that energy has units of velocity squared then you are not conveying information...

And I thought that you understood mathematics.!!!
johannes — (archived)

You wrote: “Velocity is distance moved divided by time,”
I think that: “velocity” can exist from almost “0” to at least to the speed of light,
meaning that “time” only gives the velocity a numerical value, and the numerical value can be removed without removing the motion of “whatever” has the velocity.
You wrote: ”Current is charge per time”; here also “time” only gives the “current” a numerical value which can be ignored without eliminating the current.
You wrote: Power is energy divided by time; here also you can eliminate the “time” from the equation, but there is no way you can separate “power” from “energy” or energy from power.
You wrote: “your stated equations are self referential while at the same time self contradictory.”
You did not say what equations you are referring to, but I suspect that it has to do with the equation that I posted in answer to Vitruvius. Since you are interested I’ll post the corrected version here.
The equation is: E= (U/k)*C.
Where E= total energy, meaning both potential and kinetic.
C = 299,792,458 meters per second. (Also considered as Constant.)
U= (299,792,458 m/s * k^2) = amount of potential energy / m = kinetic energy.
K = kinetic energy “within mass”. (The larger the number the greater the intrinsic kinetic energy.)
m = mass that contains “kinetic energy”. Mass and the intrinsic kinetic energy have the same numeric value.
Hope that helps.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (44 posts)

Related discussions