Re: apples and oranges

Space/Science » in reply to Re: nuclear power costs

gothgirl — 11/13/2009 7:42:45 PM (archived)

are those just construction costs? even if windmills are expensive, the wind is free. uranium costs money. and fuel processing and waste disposal is even more so. i'm not opposed to nuclear, but its no panacea, either. it has big problems, and not just safety, but financial too.

The whole thread (16 posts)

Lamar Alexander on the state of nuclear power in the U.S. - TB - 11/11/2009 8:20:32 PM
- Re: Lamar Alexander on the state of nuclear power in the U.S. - pwokenyaw - 11/12/2009 3:30:55 PM
  - Re: nuclear power costs - TB - 11/12/2009 5:17:43 PM
    - Re: Re: Re: apples and oranges - gothgirl - 11/13/2009 9:25:10 PM
      - Re: Re: windmills - more numbers - TB - 11/13/2009 10:51:14 PM
      - Re: windmills - TB - 11/13/2009 10:46:25 PM
    - Re: Re: apples and oranges - TB - 11/13/2009 9:13:46 PM
    - Re: apples and oranges - TB - 11/13/2009 8:58:30 PM
    - Re: apples and oranges - gothgirl - 11/13/2009 7:42:45 PM
    - apples and oranges - pwokenyaw - 11/13/2009 6:58:14 PM
- Nuclear Reactors Cannot Produce Power at Competitive Prices Without Subsidies. - DavidFMayerPhD - 11/12/2009 1:03:48 AM
  - Re: Re: Neither can any of the "alternative" energy solutions. - Nick_H - 11/12/2009 2:24:18 AM
    - Re: P.S. - gothgirl - 11/12/2009 12:04:09 PM
    - P.S. - TB - 11/12/2009 4:58:00 AM
    - Re: Good point. - TB - 11/12/2009 4:47:32 AM
  - Re: Neither can any of the "alternative" energy solutions. - TB - 11/12/2009 1:20:52 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (16 posts)

Related discussions