I believe I mentioned that we weren't talking about those arrested in Iraq for various actions against our military. Again, those are dealt with using legal procedures, and often result in release for those who are mostly dupes.
We're talking about why known terrorists, confessed terrorists, are being given this break when we had a working process of military tribunals in place.
Here's my theory: Obama discovered during his first year of the presidency that the real answers weren't the simplistic answers of his campaign. There was a reason for Guantanamo, and it's becoming obvious that his "closing Guantanamo" pledge has been slid under the bus.
I suspect this "civil rights for the terrorists" push is a way to mollify his base when they figure out what happened with Guantanamo.
Current Events » in reply to Re: What do you think of the 9/11 culprits being tried in Civilian Court?
Re: Re: Re: 9/11 culprits (moved)
The whole thread (14 posts)
- What do you think of the 9/11 culprits being tried in Civilian Court?
- Foreign nationals stand before US courts fairly often.
- Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11 culprits (moved)
- Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the 9/11 culprits being tried in Civilian Court?
- Re: Re: What do you think of the 9/11 culprits being tried in Civilian Court?
- Re: What do you think of the 9/11 culprits being tried in Civilian Court?
- Re: This from Senator James Webb
