Quite a nimble dance across the labels there. "Republican violence" is both categorically too narrow and I'll bet you want violence to be narrowly defined as overt physical violence too. So classically-Brownshirt tactics of intimidation wouldn't apply, like the armed campaign volunteers turning a march into a naked threat.
But where do you stand? You keep trying to triangulate, and keep your distance from the tea party movement while cheering like you've been a tea partier all your life. Asserting that not joining the "movement" is a badge of honor...and weirdly enough, you sound like turning up your nose at them makes you superior. An elitist tea partier?
This makes no sense. Are you or are you not a member of the tea party movement?
Or is it just a case of being unwilling to join a club that would have you for a member?
Re: Heh...
The whole thread (41 posts)
- I was just suspended from the Tea Party!
- ...and to that I say...
- :-) (n/t) (n/t)
- Troll? Bullshit.
- Get a clue
- BUT...
- Yoo hoo Robert...
- Nah
- Re: Nah
- Re: making sense
- Re: Re: Naht making sense
- "wolf in sheep's clothing"? Not even close
- Deleted n/t
- One thing is clear, you have tunnel vision.
- Re: Nah
- You should have left this alone
- You really DON'T have a clue
- Read the FAQ in the post above
- BUT...
- Get a clue
- Simply put, you were a troll.
- That was just in case...
- I never joined. (copied from CE)
- (moved from CE)
- I never joined.
- ...and to that I say...