Sorry, Rob, but your argument isn't logical. Judsy is talking about the next session of Congress, which will be controlled by Republicans, and Nancy Pelosi will be Minority Leader...or rather, there'll be a vote and she might get the job or she might not. It's in play, and Judsy's putting in his two cents' worth endorsing her. Because...connect the dots here...he thinks that in that job of continuing, if diminished, power, she will tarnish the reputation of Congress. All members of this future Congress controlled by Republicans. (He's being loose with his language...we're talking about the House, of course.)

Kind of a causal stretch even for Judson, but his purpose isn't a logical proof, it's to spit some bile.

Besides, when it comes to tarnishing the reputation of the next Congress, we can look forward to the antics of John Boner and Rand Paul and Michelle Bachman and their lunatic ilk to do the job. No need to stretch to pin the job on Pelosi.

Iiiiiiilk.

BTW, after you spluttered at me so hysterically for even daring to join TPN, we need to review some facts.

I joined because you and others accused me of being ignorant of the tea party "movement" etc., so I went to the source. They urged me to join up to view the information about their views locked inside (like Sharron Angle refusing to divulge her position until after elected), and I checked the publicly available terms of service, and didn't see anything preventing me from signing up.

I'm aware of the second, hidden terms of service that you don't see until after you sign up. That's pretty chickenshit, and I don't consider myself bound by an agreement that was never presented for my assent. Nevertheless, I respected the tacit request to not disrupt things.

So knock off the horseshit accusing me of being a deliberate troll and trying to disrupt things. Hell, this is the first time I've let out a peep in all these months. I kept my end of the tacit agreement to not cause trouble.

Thanks for listening.