No, I didn't
I completely understand your point. It's a perfect example of liberal double helix reasoning. The congressmen's participation equals an improvement in the risk pool. The mandate is a cash injection into subsidies for the uninsured. The "contributors" are made to pay for services they won't receive.
Buck wrote:
...while wanting to repeal healthcare for everyone else...mandates for younger people are what brings the overall costs down for ALL Americans.
Health care for everyone? The subsidies are for only 10% of the population. How do you get "everyone"?
Evidently you believe overall costs will be brought down by Obamacare. Everyone should hope you're right.