Dr. Laura commented on this today, and has been commenting on similar items for some time. Her thesis is that the agenda of these people is to eventually make children sexually accessible to them. She is routinely reviled and laughed at for this conclusion.
Two articles, Pedophilia Chic and Pedophilia Chic Reconsidered discuss this trend.
A commentary on the articles.
The real controversy in these articles is that it is pointed out that no "loosening" of standards is being pushed for adult males having sex with underage girls, and the conclusions that are drawn. There is no National Man-Girl Love Association. For that matter, there is no National Woman-Boy Love Association either. What are we supposed to think is driving this agenda?
Note that with the recent cases of the priests, what is being firmly swept under the rug is that most of these priests molested teenagers, specifically teenage boys. Very few molested children under 13, the definition of pedophilia. If some newspaper started calling them gay priests instead of pedophiliac priests, however, it would really hit the fan.
No one wants to touch this "third rail."
Off Topic » in reply to If you think that guy is bad, ....
Re: If you think that guy is bad, ....
The whole thread (42 posts)
- Marxist professor teaches American politics
- Re: Marxist professor. More stuff.
- If you think that guy is bad, ....
- OK, well . . .
- Re: OK, well . . .
- Beyond belief! You won't have the guts to read this.
- Thanks, SDAI. Pretty much covered Bowser's feeble response. (n/t) (n/t)
- And in the process, Europeans slit their own throats.
- Re: OK, well . . .