<Fellas, if the two words meant the same thing -- we wouldn’t have to have two different words.

Not to mention:

* false
* incorrect
* wrong
* fallacious
* fictitious
* imaginary
* bogus
* a sham
* erroneous
* mistaken
* inaccurate
* flawed
* wide of the mark
* not right
* an injustice

...among other things. Truth be told, Marxism remains a member of communism. Socialist, granted, but communism none the less.

Now, the above is completely out of context, but then so is this:
Of course, it makes one wonder about the intellectual honesty of someone that would equate some professor that claims to be a Marxist with child molestation..

What Tech1 stated was:
Only a half-truth. Yes, the dimbulb, selfish communists are no threat to John Q. American, but to his children who are still impressionable and look up to all adults as pillars of knowledge and experience - the communist in the classroom is a child-molester. Molesting their minds, teaching them to be selfish and believe in "equality" for all, and that the state must enforce this "unequal equality".

Yes, it is a form of child-molestation, but of the mind, which was Tech1’s very obvious point.

It works very similar to the way in which a Roman Catholic child might be riddled with doubt, were he/she forced into a classroom and subjected to Roman Mythology as a true religion, or the child of a serious NASA scientist being subjected to an anomalist’s approach to discovering ET life on Mars as a true science. The young mind is altered from the straight and narrow path laid out by the parents, where both cases would require some measure of repair work by that child’s family.

Repairing children from what is learned in a public school is not why we send children to public schools.

By the same token, raising these same topics for discussion and assignment tasks by persons well versed in Roman Mythology and Marxism would be completely acceptable.

The rest of what you wrote is very good,
Dan