Re: Well . . . Understandable to be tired, but

Space/Science » in reply to Re: Well . . .

Re: Well . . . Understandable to be tired, but

Johannes — 3/29/2002 1:18:53 PM (archived)

you said that you were the product of random chance. Please explain? :-)

The whole thread (43 posts)

Warning of Confusion Over Creationism . . . - D. Spires - 3/28/2002 10:06:56 AM
- Re: Warning of Confusion Over Creationism . . . - Johannes - 3/28/2002 5:47:25 PM
  - Easy as ABC . . - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/29/2002 9:44:14 AM
    - Re: Easy as ABC . . - Johannes - 3/29/2002 5:31:21 PM
      - Aw this won't hurt a bit. . . - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/29/2002 8:19:29 PM
        
        Re: Aw this won't hurt a bit. . . - Johannes - 3/29/2002 2:31:18 PM
      - Re: Oh, no . . . - D. Spires - 3/29/2002 7:01:44 PM
      - Are you going to be sorry you asked... ;) (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 3/29/2002 5:48:56 PM
- Re: Warning of Confusion Over Creationism . . . - Tom Brosz - 3/28/2002 2:44:55 PM
  - Let's see - Larry J - 3/29/2002 2:50:28 PM
    - Re: Dock that flier a point for Googling . . . (n/t) X^D (n/t) - D. Spires - 3/29/2002 2:53:43 PM
      - I use all means at my disposal. nt (n/t) - Larry J - 3/29/2002 4:01:47 PM
  - Sounds like sagan talking about fractals. (n/t) - RobVG - 3/28/2002 2:59:24 PM
- Re: All that matters is Doctrine - Success_Machine - 3/28/2002 12:26:14 PM
  - Re: My opinion - Success_Machine - 3/28/2002 12:35:44 PM
    - Re: My opinion - Futureboy - 3/29/2002 10:44:14 AM
      - Re: My opinion - p - 3/29/2002 4:49:37 PM
      - Re: And my opinion . . . - D. Spires - 3/29/2002 2:48:23 PM
        
        Re: And my opinion . . . - Johannes - 3/29/2002 5:40:56 PM
        
        Re: Well . . . - D. Spires - 3/29/2002 6:59:08 PM
        
        Re: Well . . . Understandable to be tired, but - Johannes - 3/29/2002 1:18:53 PM
        
        Re: I, like all living things . . . - D. Spires - 3/29/2002 4:05:08 PM
        
        Re: I, I understand your view poin now. Thank you for the explanation. (n/t) - Johannes - 3/30/2002 4:05:57 PM
        
        Re: The strong anthropic principle - Fox - 3/30/2002 9:04:32 AM
- Creative Creationism: The Dishonesty of 'Intelligent Design' Theory . . . - D. Spires - 3/28/2002 10:49:40 AM
  - Re: Creative Creationism: The Dishonesty of 'Intelligent Design' Theory . . . - p - 3/28/2002 11:19:59 AM
    - It might not be political pandering... - Larry J - 3/28/2002 11:27:21 AM
- What's the problem? - RobVG - 3/28/2002 10:47:13 AM
  - A common misconception is the meaning of the word "theory" in science - Larry J - 3/28/2002 11:24:27 AM
    - Wrong class - RobVG - 3/28/2002 11:58:11 AM
      - Re: Wrong class . . . - D. Spires - 3/28/2002 1:08:25 PM
        
        ID: older than Roddenberry - Fox - 3/30/2002 10:53:16 AM
        
        Re: Oh, no doubt at all . . . - D. Spires - 3/30/2002 9:44:59 AM
        
        Roddenberry - Tom Brosz - 3/30/2002 4:08:35 PM
        
        Re: Thinking too hard - Fox - 3/30/2002 6:03:01 PM
        
        Re: Toward the middle of the original series . . . - D. Spires - 3/30/2002 5:51:50 PM
        
        Who do they claim seeded the seeders?;) (n/t) (n/t) - RobVG - 3/28/2002 2:37:34 PM
        
        Re: Who do they claim seeded the seeders?;) (n/t) - Marcia - 4/3/2002 10:12:49 AM
        
        Now the surprise Lecture! Ha Ha! - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/29/2002 9:18:41 AM
        
        Thats very nice Tech1 but.... - RobVG - 3/29/2002 10:17:42 AM
        
        Re: Thats very nice Tech1 but.... - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/29/2002 11:23:28 AM
        
        Re: Now the surprise Lecture! Ha Ha! - Tom Brosz - 3/29/2002 9:47:34 AM
  - Re: Where is the scientific evidence to support creationism . . . ? (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 3/28/2002 10:50:39 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (43 posts)