Surely You Are Always Good For A Chuckle

Mark Eby — 6/3/2002 2:56:43 PM (archived)

Your ignorance of engineering is again exposed if you think anthropologists study more math than graduate engineers. In addition celestial mechanics are not top level mathematics. The equations were developed centuries ago and math has advanced quite a bit since then. More importantly mass and energy balances are at the heart of chemical engineering. If you don't see the relevance the jokes on you.

Regards,
Mark

The whole thread (33 posts)

Perspective on Global Warming - p - 5/31/2002 9:21:17 AM
- Re: Perspective on Global Warming - Mark Eby - 5/31/2002 9:36:21 AM
  - Re: Perspective on Global Warming - p - 5/31/2002 10:02:30 AM
    - PS On Economic Disasters - Mark Eby - 6/1/2002 11:28:53 AM
    - Perspective On Cumulative Effects & Ignoring Risks - Mark Eby - 5/31/2002 11:49:39 AM
      - Choosing - Bowser - 5/31/2002 2:24:14 PM
        
        Re: Choosing - Tom Brosz - 5/31/2002 3:21:28 PM
        
        Re: Choosing - John O'Halloran - 6/1/2002 7:26:07 PM
        
        Political agenda - Bowser - 6/1/2002 8:11:36 AM
        
        Re: Political agenda - Tom Brosz - 6/1/2002 6:15:28 PM
      - Computer models are only as good as their underlying understanding... - Larry J - 5/31/2002 12:57:19 PM
        
        Re: Computer models are only as good as their underlying understanding... - Johannes - 6/2/2002 6:06:00 PM
        
        More Notes On Computer models - Mark Eby - 6/2/2002 9:16:51 AM
        
        The complexity of the climate is far beyond any other computer model - Larry J - 6/2/2002 1:07:09 PM
        
        Don't Think So - Mark Eby - 6/2/2002 2:43:40 PM
        
        Show me a single validated climate model and I'll listen - Larry J - 6/3/2002 12:49:52 PM
        
        GIGO & Missing Simple Points - Mark Eby - 6/3/2002 3:34:16 PM
        
        And you're still missing the obvious - Larry J - 6/4/2002 12:25:10 PM
        
        I Got The Point 3 Posts Ago & Strongly Disagree - Mark Eby - 6/4/2002 1:54:51 PM
        
        Yes And - Mark Eby - 5/31/2002 3:03:20 PM
        
        But we know the models are poor - E.P. Grondine - 6/1/2002 5:30:26 PM
        
        More On The Listserve Impact Expert - Mark Eby - 6/1/2002 11:19:08 AM
        
        We Know Peiser No Climate Expert - Mark Eby - 6/1/2002 9:11:46 AM
        
        In your judgement - E.P. Grondine - 6/1/2002 10:21:03 AM
        
        And Peiser's Climate Credentials Are? - Mark Eby - 6/1/2002 10:50:45 AM
        
        Perhaps you should take the time to find out - E.P. Grondine - 6/2/2002 3:44:37 PM
        
        Sure - Mark Eby - 6/2/2002 4:34:30 PM
        
        Surely - E.P.Grondine - 6/3/2002 3:32:18 PM
        
        Surely You Are Always Good For A Chuckle - Mark Eby - 6/3/2002 2:56:43 PM
        
        And you are always sure good for a sigh - E.P. Grondine - 6/4/2002 8:47:40 AM
        
        I'm So Impressed - Mark Eby - 6/4/2002 1:45:25 PM
        
        Good summary of problem n/t (n/t) - gbaikie - 5/31/2002 1:41:10 PM
        
        Re: GW Discussion - PL - 5/31/2002 4:12:25 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (33 posts)