Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to Once again, you invoke political dogma as a substitute for sound science

Larry Swings at 1 Out of 7

Larry,

Forgot to mention you addressed only 1 point out of 7. Did you agree with the article on the other 5 issues I criticised?

I did give it credit for one good counter argument. It made sense to me even if it didn't to Alcaray. However, given the flaws in the author's logic elsewhere I'm not at all sure that modeling failure is actually significant. The amount of energy retained in the portion of atmosphere deviating from models even if true is probably a small portion of the total retained given the much lower density of the upper atmosphere.

Regards,
Mark

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (38 posts)