If you don't see the Vietnam-era anti-military propaganda, especially in the first article, then I don't know how else to point it out.

One of my objections was the headlines. Given, as you point out, that some of these articles have a wide range of information, why select a negative headline? In the second article for example, why wasn't the headline "U.S. Pounds Taliban Positions?" or "Christians Massacred in Attack on Church?" This information was also in this article.

No, we are being worked on by a propaganda campaign, even if it is not an organized one. There's nothing I can do about it in a free country of course, but I don't have to like it.