<I like a little irrationality with my coffee in the morning.

I figured as much. ;-)

How do you know so much about the inner workings of international intelligence and police work living out there all by yourself in the desert?

Sometimes I ask myself that same question. Just lucky I guess. Here is a link you may find educational. Please note the 28 million dollar yearly funding

Look how quickly people like you jump on the news - only because they are rooting for Al Qaida.

Logic, please?

Reading Bowser is like reading the Palestine Times. Almost everything the media has printed that makes the US or US military look bad - he has posted. After about twenty to fifty posts you figure, "Hey this guy isn't rooting for the home team."


If I were to point out that the perps of certain capital crimes are still officially listed at large, even though no one has heard from them or seen them in years, does that mean I'm rooting for murderers and rapists?

Depends on how you post it and how often you post it. If you post it gloatingly with defamation of the police - I might logically suspect you get your kicks out of seeing felons elude the police.

That's just plain old mean character assassination.

No, that's just plain old mean common sense.


Though it is logical to believe that bin Laden is buried under tons of rock, it's just as logical to believe that he got out early and is in hiding. What isn't logical is to pronounce a man dead after a year of invisibility in an area of the world where there's a powerful disincentive to cooperate and where the infrastructure, such as it was, has been largely destroyed one way or another. It's not as if he hasn't enough money to find shelter...

The issue is tone...from his anti-Israel posts, to his justification of suicide bombers, to his criticism of all US military operations in pursuit of Al Qaida....you realize that Bowser is sympathetic to the terrorist's cause. As they speak almost exactly as he does.


Your attempt to spin this viewpoint as sympathy for Al Q'aida attempts to cover up the Bush Administration's embarrassment over not "getting Osama", as the President said they would. My suspicion (worth just as much as your assertion) is that the US is still looking for him too.



If we aren't, we're fools.



Or we wanted an alive figurehead to rally against. A dead Osama - like a dead Hitler - takes the fight out of the troops somewhat...don't you think? You think that maybe just maybe...Bush is smarter than we think? Maybe our troops and resources are better than we let on? You think maybe he orchestrated a brilliant divide between powerful Jewish media interests and Hollywood celebrities during this election cycle so as to divide some of the most powerful and influential democrats on an issue dear to many of them*, thus insuring the GOP much less harsh media coverage than Dole got in 1996 or he received in 2000?

Yes, Bush may be a genius...or is simply surrounded by geniuses. The outcome of the election hints at more than casual intelligence going on behind the scenes.

Or perhaps you are right. Osama got away and has decided perhaps it was time to retire.

We will probably know after the administration's middle-east goals have been achieved.

;-)

SDAI-Tech1

* i.e. the welfare of Israel