I think that was the Clinton/Albrieght policy

Current Events » in reply to Re: Guarding settlers in the Middle East

Scott — 12/20/2002 4:41:00 PM (archived)

We pretty much tried not to take sides. Going so far as to ignore terrorist attacks like the Cole incident...Which Clinton NEVER responded to...

Clinton wanted to pretend that the US could be neutral...In trying to be like the Swiss, look at the price we ultimatly paid.

They will attack the US even if there is no Isreal.

In fact, if there was no Isreal, they would probably attack us all the more. Its a great way to consolidate power: Create and attack a common enemy...Be it Jews, The US, Blacks, Republicans in Congress, the Rich...Its funny how two-bit politicians can consolidate power by attacking the "evil-doers".

And they though Bush was the first to take the approach!

Go figure.

Scott

The whole thread (15 posts)

Guarding settlers in the Middle East - Raoul - 12/20/2002 4:02:01 PM
- Think I can still pull off a wealthy westerner act? n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 12/20/2002 6:27:41 PM
  - Re: Hmmm:-) - Raoul - 12/21/2002 11:16:58 AM
- Re: Middle East - Tom Brosz - 12/20/2002 5:30:54 PM
  - Well if your memory only goes back that far and no further... - alcaray - 12/20/2002 6:25:26 PM
    - Bingo!!! - Bowser - 12/20/2002 6:55:49 PM
    - Memory - Tom Brosz - 12/20/2002 6:54:43 PM
      - Typical deflective argument. Never mind. n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 12/20/2002 7:22:20 PM
        
        Re: Typical - Tom Brosz - 12/20/2002 11:40:05 AM
        
        Statistics - alcaray - 12/23/2002 5:44:18 PM
        
        Trying to make the stats prettier - alcaray - 12/23/2002 5:55:31 PM
        
        nuts! n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 12/23/2002 5:56:19 PM
- Yep. n/t (n/t) - Bowser - 12/20/2002 4:43:40 PM
- Re: Guarding settlers in the Middle East - McFly - 12/20/2002 4:28:51 PM
  - I think that was the Clinton/Albrieght policy - Scott - 12/20/2002 4:41:00 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)