Your message
has alternated between
1. He's a murderous thug
2. He's supplying terrorists
3. He's building nuclear weapons.
Whenever Bush (or dutiful BBM here) has to avoid the little evidence of 2 or 3, you can always rely on number one.
Despite the fact that he was a murderous thug back then, we happily supplied him with cowboy boots and golden spurs and letters congratulating him on his reelection (!).
I am not defending him at all - he is a murderous thug - just don't claim the moral high ground here.
If the argument is so compelling now, where was your moral outrage before?
Sorry, I just find the hypocricy exhibited by the right to be just as sickening as any apologists on the left.
Cheers,
Tony