It shows that Al Queda is weak. They haven't been able to launch an attack such as this inside of the United States since 9/11/2001. So now they are settling for attacks closer to their support base in a place like Saudi Arabia.
That tells me that we must be doing something right: Because given the chance I'm sure they would much rather attack the US on US soil. In short, they are losing their ability to reach out and touch the average american.
Al Queda's base of operations is narrowing. And even in places like Saudi Arabia, the pressure is being turned up on the terrorists.
If anything, this attack will end up giving the Saudi government more justification for cracking down on the terrorists and their base of support.
Scott
Current Events » in reply to Re: The attack is still on Western affiliates . . .
Yes.
The whole thread (46 posts)
- Terrorism in Riyadh
- Saudi Bomb May Have Killed 90 . . .
- Re: Terrorism in Riyadh
- Better there than in New York...
- That is precisely...
- Re: Terrorism in Riyadh
- Yeah, like no terrorists blew anything up before we went to Iraq. (n/t) (n/t)
- And that was supposed to be discouraged by the show of American might.
- Re: And that was supposed to be discouraged by the show of American might.
- Re: And that was supposed to be discouraged by the show of American might.
- It has. Didn't you see the stats?
- Didn't you see the real reason for the 44% decrease in stats. Keep up. n/t (n/t)
- Fact; fewer Americans have died from terrorist in 2002 than in 2001.
- Re: Fact: One disaster can skew the stats
- Fact; fewer Americans have died from terrorist in 2002 than in 2001.
- Didn't you see the real reason for the 44% decrease in stats. Keep up. n/t (n/t)
- And while we are cleaning up the dead elephant...
- And that was supposed to be discouraged by the show of American might.
