No Way Jose Again
Your sources of reading are limited if you consider it a two sided discussion. BD himself admitted it was not using the justification that Levin's side was undertold. Presenting only the counter arguments you can dismiss is not a two sided debate. Barry presented Levin's counters to arguments against his interpretation not the actual arguments of his critics or a direct rebuttal to Levin.
Being right for the wrong reason does not make you a scientific pioneer. A conspiracy theory book will never be regarded as an important scientific work regardless. It is a fundamentally unscientific approach.
Regards,
Mark