"To fill in for Tom [......] I'll take up the role of rhetorical rhapsodist."
At which point I, er, cringed in breathless anticipation.
and the rest convinced me you were neither rhetorical nor a rapsodist.
Some, er, 'samples':
"Believing a torturing dictator doesn't possess illegal or banned weapons is like believing celebrities homes don't have firearms and security systems concealed within."
Yes! absolutely! The two go togtehr like Ham and Cheese! Quarks and Gluons! Love and Marriage! Just believe me brother, you can't have one without the other!
Im sold! Hooked, bagged, tagged and sold! Where do I sign!
"No self respecting tyrant ever obeys conventions & treaties - or feels the need to do so. "
Maybe he was insecure that year? Or maybe he slept with too many mules that year to qualify as self-respecting?
As to the rest, the 'musical' argument:
WHAT?! Man, you are nuts. Really just nuts. I mean, what can I even say to that? You really want to run that horse in this race?
Wow. Man. Go take another hit.
Davin L.
Current Events » in reply to You really believe Saddam didn't have WMD?
Do you still believe SARS is Race specific? What about 'vorticies' or 'vorlons' or whatever those were?
The whole thread (31 posts)
- CNN 'breaking news'
- U.S.: Banned arms evidence in Iraq
- re: CNN 'breaking news'
- MSNBC story - old stuff, but still significant