But in the context of how many people Nicole knew who wore them they are substantial proof. Again context is key. You and Don seem utterly oblivious to the context of Saddam's 10 year pattern of behavior. I'll grant that the jury may still be out on the trailers and that burial is not conclusive evidence, but to hand wave it away based on contrary reports by people with a record of negative portrayal of GW2 is not a well founded approach to forming an opinion on the issue. Your criticism of the CIA and FBI's credibility overlooks the fact that many within those organizations stated our proof of Iraq's transgressions prior to the war was not iron clad.

Of course some might feel the opinion is not based on evodence at all, but that has been said of both sides. I'm against Bush's stance on many other issues so I think I'm more impartial than most of you here, but then again I've been wanting to get rid of Saddam for over 10 years.

Regards,
Mark