The word "agenda" is slightly inflammatory.
Next thing you'll be calling him "anti-American", or a "terrorist sympathizer".
When Clinton got caught with his pants down, it wasn't an anti-Clinton agenda; it was plain and simple politicking. You lie. You get caught. Someone holds you accountable (usually the other party).
And in case you missed this REB, I replied to you.....way down on this page:
They lie. We lie.
We bomb. They die.
C'mon, these pieces were buried for over a decade! That's like going in and bombing some Columbine kids house because he has matches buried in his backyard.
We were keeping our eye on him; inspectors were doing their job.
Sadam was unable to build anything else there.
However, with friends in Syria and who know where else, he could have been funnelling money to ANY group so they could buy their WMD's on the OPEN INTERNATIONAL WMD MARKET.
And we can go in and blow up and TRY to take over country we think threatens us, until one day we pick on the wrong country and we can all kiss our lifestyles goodbye.
Iraq was NOT about the threat of WMD, but the takeover of the oil fields for world economic dominance.
Period.
Current Events » in reply to He has an anti-Bush agenda, and that is all he can see.
Anti-Bush agenda?
The whole thread (24 posts)
- Can Anyone Tell Me Why The Normally Rational Don Can't Face The Buried Lab Issue?
