Chris wrote: So what is there to stop me beating him up on that list?

EP wrote: About zero tolerance for addle brained bullshit, Mr Vancil.

Chris writes: Hum, I have in fact looked at archived posts to the Cambridge "Conference" list and see no evidence that they "have zero tolerance for addle brained bullshit" from you.

Chris wrote: If I bring up a point he will either have to reply to it or run as he does here...

EP wrote: Mr Vancil, both Barry and myself have often taken time to reply to the Mars Nuts who reside here. The problem is not a lack of response on our parts, but the simple fact that the Mars Nuts brains are so warped by their manned Mars fantasies that it interferes with their perception - they are simply incapable of even comprehending answers which interfere with those fantasies.

Chris writes: All Barry ever does is cut and paste other peoples words and when he uses his own he just repeats the same BS over. That is not a reply to questions or to evidence. Give us an example of where you actually answered one of my questions. Like where is that simple engineering proof of The NASA Reference Mission being less engineered that earlier manned mission plans? I answered my own question on the ideal Mars Suit weight because you are no expert on Spacesuits yet imply you are!

EP wrote: That's why I invite you to write to the Conference - others will point out the response to you, and hopefully you will finally be able to see at least one of them.

Chris writes: I must be confused! You and I have written here at HZ Space Science and your non existing replies should be here. All that taking this to the Cambridge "Conference" list does is change forums. I can show science is being done at MDRS and FMARS, so now prove we're doing pseudoscience and why. You haven't here and moving somewhere else isn't going to make it easier for you to do so. Please take the short moments to ponder Doctor Stephen P. Braham's CV and tell us how he isn't a scientist and that his papers aren't science.

--Chris Vancil