EP wrote on Nick Hoffman's work: I can't afford to have the watery Mars Nuts wasting more time and money on this nonsense of theirs, and your observations should put a neat end to it, whether you like it or not.
Chris writes: Got to ask why Grondine can't afford Blue Mars research being done. And if its nonsense exactly why? It seems to be winning the argument at the moment. Of coarse this doesn't mean Nick's White Mars theory is trash. BTW, Nicks theory doesn't stop liquid water flowing on Mars it only shows an alternative method for erosion to have taken place. Both could have existed in the geological past of Mars. After all if these turn out to be liquid water erosion features on Mars then they shows us all Mars is Earth like, don't you know!
--Chris Vancil
Space/Science » in reply to Facts are facts...
re: EP's Flawed Logic
The whole thread (30 posts)
- Put a face on those EP calls "Mars Nuts": Stephen P. Braham's CV
- I've got a theory about E.P...
- Talking about the impact hazard again, I see...
- EP Certainly Damages The Credibility of The NEO Hazard But
- I tend to agree with Alex...
- I've got a theory about E.P...